• @HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    The consequence of always choosing the middle ground is that the middle ground will be progressively pulled toward the right.

    It’s like finding the average of an array of integers. If someone keeps adding negative numbers to the array, eventually the average will be negative. The people who instinctively go “but compromise!!!” without question or criticism are no smarter than a computer blindly computing the mean of a list.

    • @ganymede@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      09 days ago

      “Meet me in the middle, says the unjust man.

      You take a step towards him, he takes a step back.

      Meet me in the middle, says the unjust man.”

    • Fatur_New
      link
      fedilink
      English
      08 days ago

      The consequence of always choosing the middle ground is that the middle ground will be progressively pulled toward the right.

      You’re right. Ronald Reagan is prove for this. Ronald Reagan pulled what FDR did

    • Fatur_New
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Georgism isn’t enough. We need more than georgism because big corporations in America aren’t average merchants who only want to sell their stuff. We need socialism or, minimum, distributism to fix this mess

      Edit:

      1. Change “to fix that” to “to fix this mess”
      2. Change “ordinary merchants” to “average merchants”
  • The Menemen
    link
    fedilink
    09 days ago

    Did the meaning of “neoliberals” change? Didn’t that mean conservative economically liberal people like George W. Bush and Dick Cheney?

    • Nakoichi [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      09 days ago

      Neoliberalism is the guiding ethos of both the Republican and the Democratic parties since at least the 80s. Austerity, deregulation, gutting worker protections and social services. Every single president since Reagan has been a neoliberal of some form.