• @voluble@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    07 months ago

    This is the sort of thing that the old internet could really deliver on. Chances are, a search query could lead you to some guy’s hoodie blog, and he just liked hoodies, and posted honestly about them.

    Now, it’s all a mess of SEO pumped affiliate link lists filled with crapware. If the query is even thinkable, there will be AI generated pages stuffed with sponsored links, ready and waiting for you. And with search engines preferring recent results, that’s the type of page you’ll be served.

    I’ve had decent luck using marginalia search to seek out some of those old internet type results. Obscurity works as a barrier to corporate infiltration. Plus you get page results that don’t have a million tracking and analytics scripts running on them, which is refreshing.

  • Rolling Resistance
    link
    fedilink
    07 months ago

    “You click on a reddit link but their certificate expired and the page isn’t opening”

  • @qooqie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    07 months ago

    Because Reddit is infested with bot accounts at this point I tend to trust older threads over newer ones. Easy as hell to buy accs to say a competitor sucks dick

  • @Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    there needs to be a crowd sourced product review and maintenance website that can see trends of enshittification.

    • @grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 months ago

      The trick is designing the thing in such a way as to resist infiltration by astroturfing marketers.

    • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      07 months ago

      I think it would need to be a subscriber service paid for by consumers who are willing to pay for good reviews. Otherwise the consumers become the product and eventually marketers take over.

      Also crowd-sourced reviews are what we’re supposed to have already, both on Reddit and Amazon (and anywhere else).

      What I envision would be a publication that funds a set of reviewers (maybe a mix of full time and part time, since some products are appropriate for testing as a job while others are more appropriate to just use for a while).

      Each product would either be bought by the org directly, or if manufacturers provide review samples, a layer of indirection is used to avoid the reviewer feeling like they need to give a good review to keep the free shit coming (with clear communication to the supplier that free or not well have no effect on the review).

      Any issues get included in the review fairly, along with any kind of resolution (which should ideally go through both consumer channels as well as reviewer back channels, the former to show what average customers should expect, the latter to hopefully resolve design flaws).

      The reviewer will then keep the product and give updates, either in the form of “still using it and it is like x after y months/years”, “doesn’t get much use because I’m using this other thing instead because of x, y, z”, or “doesn’t get much use because I’m not really part of the target audience”.

      My complete vision includes brick and mortar locations where products are available to try out, and maybe sales handled there, where any product available has a “we vouch for the quality of this product” where flaws are highlighted as much as features are.

      Though I think the idea is self-defeating because if it gains momentum, it could halt or reverse enshitification and make it redundant, fail, then enshitification returns. Ideally, enshitification is stopped with legislation about quality and enforcement that questions why a bad design is used when a better one is obvious.

    • @parody@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      07 months ago

      Let’s say everyone used an identity verification service to signup, like had to send photos of their ID and their SSN (national identity number) to be vetted by a third party.

      How long after the service got popular would it take for the most aggressive marketers to pay rings of fraudsters to lend their identities and/or make fake reviews?

      I think it would definitely start out great until it got big enough to be super useful and then the fraud would ramp up. I think an organization like Consumer Reports has a chance at successfully maintaining a low-bias product database, but the paywall is a big obstacle, as is the fact they’ll only review the largest product catalogs.

      • @azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        07 months ago

        These are the pitfalls with the “amazon reviews/yelp” model.

        A decent implementation of the Wikipedia/FOSS model sidesteps this because it theoretically is run by opinionated curators. No amount of bots/shills can break the article soft-lock ounce foul play is spotted.

        That’s not to say these systems haven’t been occasionally broken through more sophisticated attacks, but empirically it seems clear that the model generally works well enough given enough community engagement (which would be the biggest challenge IMO, because maintainers can’t be expected to buy every product, and reliable primary sources may be hard to come by).

    • @racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      07 months ago

      No it doesn’t?

      I just googled it to be sure, but i already assumed you meant ‘spyware’ (which is something completely different), referring to the telemetry (which i can get is a sensitive thing, but anonymous usage statistics to know where to focus their development sounds like a decent idea, and afaik they implemented it with respect for the user)

      • I remember the concern years ago was: since the application was bought (acquired?) and the tool was still publically free, that the new owners had added the spyware to try and monetize the data coming from said spyware/telemetry.

        After reading your comment I went back and did some cursory searches, and it looks like the general concensus is that its less of a concern than it was originally - although, there is still uncertainty around how the tool is being monetized, which is enough for some to stop using it.

        • @racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          07 months ago

          It just joined the musescore project, great open source music notation software. For funding the only commercial thing they offer is a site where you can upload & download scores, with the paying part also paying licensining fees for copyrighted music. Imo all looks very legit. I was already familiar with musescore before this drama, and watched some of tantacrul (head of the musescore project, and now also audacity i guess). He’s a very down to earth guy that has quite some insightful videos on the musescore development and figuring out what to keep/remove when going for new versions. But also great videos regarding other topics.

          So far i’ve seen nothing that rings any alarm bells. The open source community can sometimes be a bit too sensitive regarding paid services linked to open source software. But in this case as long as the actual software remains open source, and the paid part actually adds value (a nice place to exchange sheet music, without any copyright issues as that’s covered by your payment, so a very legit reason to ask money), why not?

    • RayJW
      link
      fedilink
      07 months ago

      That’s why Tenacity is here to save the day!

      • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        07 months ago

        After all of the controversies, Tenacity was born. It first started as temporary-audacity on GitHub since it didn’t have a name. In order to decide a new name for the project, the lead maintainer at the time held a vote. Among the new names were “Audacium”, “Sneedacity”, and “Tenacity”. The name Sneedacity would later gain traction among 4chan members, resulting in a large volume of votes for the name Sneedacity.

        In response to the large volume of votes by 4chan members, the previous maintainers had an emergency vote, choosing the name Tenacity instead of Sneedacity. This upset some, leading to the creation of a new fork with virtually the same intentions. Unsurpringly, this fork was named Sneedacity.

        Sneedacity lmao

  • @sakodak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    07 months ago

    When you Google for “best whatever” and land on a reddit thread, take some time to look at the histories of the people commenting.

    You’ll find many cases where the only post they’ve ever made was for that product, and cases where the person posting the question also posts in the comments with an answer, like they forgot to switch to alt accounts.

    A lot of it is obvious SEO marketing nonsense. Trust nothing. The entire Internet is trying to scam you. Enshittification, indeed. This used to be a nice neighborhood before the capitalists moved in in the 90s.

  • @w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    07 months ago

    You buy it anyway, and it’s a great purchase. Very happy. Dog eats it a few days later and the product is discontinued. Or Is it just me?

  • @JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    07 months ago

    If you really are looking for a hoodie: 1620.
    Prices are high, they’re very proud of their products. Their work pants aren’t worth it, garage. Both pairs I bought don’t come close to my Wrangler for durability.
    However, their hoodie is pretty dope. It’s long, and the hood is huge. A proper functioning hood. It’s thick & warm. Only downside is it’s long, and I’m 6’1", it falls below my ass. The waist is also wide, or my waist is just more narrow than the average tradesman they’re targeting.

  • @Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    07 months ago

    Everyone replies with ‘thanks’, ‘nailed it’. ‘Holy shit that’s perfect’

    To a comment that’s [deleted]

  • @AnAverageSnoot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    When I started fishing as a hobby, I couldn’t believe that it was the only hobby I’ve ever taken up that pretty much had unanimous recommendations for beginners. Everyone seemed to suggest the Ugly Stik GX2 on every website or forum. And there were no threads about how I should buy a more expensive rod/reel, other than a few that mentioned that I might want to upgrade the reel on the GX2 after a year or so.

    Even the salesperson at the Bass Pro Shops store recommended the GX2 even though I could have afforded a bit more.

    It was a completely new experience for me. I am used to having to spend at least $300-400 on initial investments for new hobbies. Fishing was only $120 for everything!

    • @DSTGU@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      07 months ago

      My hobby (speedcubing) is like that as well. If you ask any semi competent speedcuber you will hear something along the lines of “Get the newest RS3M (9$) and maybe some lube (4$)”. I love it for that.

      (Of course it s all a foot-in-the-door scam to get you hooked so you buy other events but shhh)

  • @Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    07 months ago

    Gerber Legend 800 Multitool

    The one I got from a PX the year after it was released is epic. Have carried it for 23 years. It has seen everything and outside of scraping the knife sharpish again, has never been maintained. I misplaced it for a bit (under friends driver’s seat for about a year) and couldn’t find a replacement “upgrade”. Did the Leatherman wave2 for a bit. Couldn’t take it, hit up eBay, got 3 more Gerber L800s (later release, still in boxes)…so bad. They just felt cheaper. When we stumbled upon my old Gerber, I kept the new ones for parts. Replace my knife with a new one…it already has rust dots on it. My old one after decades of abuse and being sharpened to half it’s starting width, doesn’t have a spot of rust on it.

    ANYWAY…yeah…what OP said.

  • Anti-Face Weapon
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    For something like a hoodie, I recommend you go to a thrift store. Anything you find there will be durable and quality enough to survive, and you can feel it or try it on. It’s very easy to find high quality stuff while thrifting. 8 dollars for what might cost 80 new.

    Try to focus on non-synthetic fibers or semi synthetic. Plastics in clothing are bad for the environment.

    • @Naz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      07 months ago

      Plastic in clothes is bad for you, not just the environment

      Microplastics apparently do infiltrate through the skin

      We have… done bad things with our world.

    • LucasWaffyWaf
      link
      fedilink
      07 months ago

      I snagged the world’s comfiest leather jacket for $8 at a local thrift shop. All it needed was some stitching in a couple pockets, but it’s bloody perfect otherwise. Eight friggen bucks.