• bermuda
    link
    fedilink
    English
    74
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    pot calling the kettle black are we

    (I just googled this phrase since to be honest I didn’t know its origins and I really prefer the 1639 version “Pot calling the pan burnt-arsed” now)

  • @SNFi@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    46
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Ah! I just configured yesterday my router to block all the Apple tracking requests (via DNS)… My Android don’t have Google, so they are technically wrong, there is no Apple OS with no tracking (as it is closed source).

    EDIT: Also, we don’t need to listen them, we have proofs: https://www.scss.tcd.ie/doug.leith/apple_google.pdf 😼

  • @Skies5394@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    302 years ago

    Slides from 20 years ago.

    This is news, yes, especially considering that Apple made a deal with the devil considering its new self-reported bloom as privacy focused.

    But news headlines are acting like Apple just said this today, and that is complete headline bait.

    • @baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      10 years ago, I dont think android was released on 2003.

      The 2013-era slides describe, in typical modest fashion for Apple, its overall approach at the time to privacy.

  • m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    29
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Yet Apple gladly takes billions from Google so that they remain the default search engine.

    • @erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Yes it’s all business.

      Partnership team finds the biggest bidder for the default search.

      Marketing teams find the best argument against their biggest competitor.

      At no point anyone is pondering if Google is “good” or “bad” because companies typically don’t care.

  • bedrooms
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I guess what that slide meant was not what the author thought.

    Well, yes, Android is a “massive tracking device”, but Google Search is not the culprit. Android apps were able to collect user data easily because they didn’t have to ask for users’ permission (and even today, by using an old Android API iirc).

    So, no, I don’t trust Apple, but that slide is probably irrelevant.

    • @chrismit3s@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      and even today, by using an old Android API iirc

      Nope, the required API to have your app in the Playstore constantly rises, and if you don’t comply you get kicked. The current API version is something around 26, and definitely has the permissions model integrated.

      • bedrooms
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Yeah, but you can distribute your app outside and the official store then

      • @CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        They’re also adding an API version check on devices, which will affect old apps that have gotten around the store checks. Only affects devices that can upgrade to 14, but it’s a solid step.

    • @zzzzz@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      232 years ago

      Well, in this case, it is a lie of omission. It is true that Android devices are massive trackers. But, so are Apple devices.

      • Alex
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Depends which Android devices. I don’t have any unlatched Google apps in my phone

        • @zzzzz@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          True. Me too. The fact that you can degoogle some Android phones while you cannot de-apple iphones makes the lie of omission particularly vicious.