ɐɥO to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoI hate that guylemmy.ohaa.xyzimagemessage-square134fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageI hate that guylemmy.ohaa.xyzɐɥO to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square134fedilink
minus-square@Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink0•1 year agoThat seems to be mostly about monetization and commodification, which should already be absent from shitposting.
minus-square@can@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink0•1 year agoI get that but I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance.
minus-square@SpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•1 year agoWell somebody should pop over to Chagrin Falls and ask him
minus-squareInstigatelinkfedilink0•1 year ago I think he’d feel this similarly devalues it. I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance. Well… which is it? Do you respect him too much to assume his stance or are you assuming he’d feel this similarly devalues it?
minus-square@can@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink0•1 year agoI mean I don’t want to assume he’d be alright with it therefore I won’t use it. Nothing I said was definitive, just what I think.
minus-square@can@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink0•1 year agoI suppose that would also have worked, but no.
That seems to be mostly about monetization and commodification, which should already be absent from shitposting.
I get that but I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance.
Well somebody should pop over to Chagrin Falls and ask him
Well… which is it? Do you respect him too much to assume his stance or are you assuming he’d feel this similarly devalues it?
I mean I don’t want to assume he’d be alright with it therefore I won’t use it. Nothing I said was definitive, just what I think.
Did you mean “this” stance, maybe?
I suppose that would also have worked, but no.