I mean, I’m all for giving jobs to humans and all, but isn’t monitoring a bunch of numbers and sending an alert when they go wrong one of the few things computers are actually objectively better at than humans are?
I would assume that these people are there mainly because they know what to do if something goes wrong, instead of sitting there for easily automatable tasks.
I also have to assume they probably do rotations of control room and more active work, or it would get suuuuper boring real fast. Plus their skills would get rusty if nothing ever happened.
It’s probably also highly automated and the staff’s job is just to watch for irregularities and alert the necessary teams.
I mean, I’m all for giving jobs to humans and all, but isn’t monitoring a bunch of numbers and sending an alert when they go wrong one of the few things computers are actually objectively better at than humans are?
I think the computers do send the alert, via the screen to those people who then need to act on it.
I would assume that these people are there mainly because they know what to do if something goes wrong, instead of sitting there for easily automatable tasks.
I also have to assume they probably do rotations of control room and more active work, or it would get suuuuper boring real fast. Plus their skills would get rusty if nothing ever happened.
But maybe I’m overly optimistic.
Watching the same screen show the same shit all day long would be boring as hell.
Aside from redundancy being an important safety thing, I’d guess they also have a pretty good idea what to do if something goes wrong.
It’s because of something actually does go wrong, it might take all of them to deal with the issue and the fallout