@Zerush@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoYouTubefile.coffeeimagemessage-square138fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageYouTubefile.coffee@Zerush@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square138fedilink
minus-square@AndrasKrigare@beehaw.orglinkfedilink0•1 year agoCould you explain to me how “if someone wants to use my work, they should pay me for it” could be perceived as racketeering, let alone “textbook?”
minus-square@SinAdjetivos@beehaw.orglinkfedilink0•1 year agoThere’s “if someone wants to use my work, they should pay me for it” and there’s “intentionally sabotage the work/service provided in order to extract more profits.”
minus-square@AndrasKrigare@beehaw.orglinkfedilink0•edit-21 year ago“The work or service provided for free?” If so what’s the difference? If you’re getting something for free you have no right to complain
Could you explain to me how “if someone wants to use my work, they should pay me for it” could be perceived as racketeering, let alone “textbook?”
There’s “if someone wants to use my work, they should pay me for it” and there’s “intentionally sabotage the work/service provided in order to extract more profits.”
“The work or service provided for free?” If so what’s the difference? If you’re getting something for free you have no right to complain