pacjo to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 1 year agoI absolutely love VideoLAN's stance regarding patentslemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up11.05Karrow-down111
arrow-up11.04Karrow-down1imageI absolutely love VideoLAN's stance regarding patentslemmy.dbzer0.compacjo to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square68fedilink
minus-square@hglman@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish13•1 year agoNo, the proof - program correspondence is in both directions.
minus-square@GeniusIsme@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish-2•1 year agoCorrespondence is quite a weak relation. Very far from one being another.
minus-squareladlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoI’d say if you ask a mathematician, they would disagree with you. But maybe that depends on how far they have gone into maths from common sense
minus-square@MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoCorrespondence is not correlation.
No, the proof - program correspondence is in both directions.
Correspondence is quite a weak relation. Very far from one being another.
I’d say if you ask a mathematician, they would disagree with you. But maybe that depends on how far they have gone into maths from common sense
That’s why it’s also called Curry-Howard isomorphism.
Correspondence is not correlation.