@0x4E4F@infosec.pub to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoSteve Balmer quotesinfosec.pubimagemessage-square236fedilinkarrow-up11.27Karrow-down135
arrow-up11.23Karrow-down1imageSteve Balmer quotesinfosec.pub@0x4E4F@infosec.pub to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square236fedilink
minus-squareoce 🐆linkfedilink18•1 year agoAnarchy is not absence of rules, it’s absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.
minus-square@mcmoor@bookwormstory.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoBut then one person disagree with those rules and we’re back to no rules
Allow all code merges automatically
Anarchy is not absence of rules, it’s absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.
Basicaly democracy on steroids
But then one person disagree with those rules and we’re back to no rules
You can have a majority vote system.
So we could use a blockchain… (/s)