@Player2@sopuli.xyz to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 1 year agoLand (r)u(le)sesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down10
arrow-up16arrow-down1imageLand (r)u(le)sesopuli.xyz@Player2@sopuli.xyz to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 1 year agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-square@doctorcrimson@lemmy.todaylinkfedilink0•1 year agoMost of Montana, 62% officially, is fields so that seems really inaccurate
minus-square@Player2@sopuli.xyzOPlinkfedilink0•1 year agoThe position on the diagram is arbitrary, it just shows the proportion of land use type
minus-square@lemillionsocks@beehaw.orglinkfedilink1•1 year agoAh that makes a lot of sense. I was wondering how the Adirondacks in NY and northern Vermont are “Urban Commercial housing” and north eastern tip of Ohio is maple syrup.
Most of Montana, 62% officially, is fields so that seems really inaccurate
The position on the diagram is arbitrary, it just shows the proportion of land use type
Ah that makes a lot of sense. I was wondering how the Adirondacks in NY and northern Vermont are “Urban Commercial housing” and north eastern tip of Ohio is maple syrup.