@kalkulat@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoUS judge rules: if you can't prove damages, car-makers can continue to intercept and record customers' mobile phone activity.therecord.mediaexternal-linkmessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up1352arrow-down17cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgprivacy@lemmy.mlprivacy@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1345arrow-down1external-linkUS judge rules: if you can't prove damages, car-makers can continue to intercept and record customers' mobile phone activity.therecord.media@kalkulat@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square125fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgprivacy@lemmy.mlprivacy@lemmy.ml
minus-square@Maggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoSure except under this logic there’s no injury to someone peering through your windows. After all they didn’t do anything else…
minus-square@bastion@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoNice take. I myself am fine with the ruling, but only if we get a full-ownership deal on the car, and can legally completely gut and replace parts that do that. Also, the car should be sold with a warning label regarding these issues.
Sure except under this logic there’s no injury to someone peering through your windows. After all they didn’t do anything else…
Nice take.
I myself am fine with the ruling, but only if we get a full-ownership deal on the car, and can legally completely gut and replace parts that do that. Also, the car should be sold with a warning label regarding these issues.