@brown567@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 2 years agoOwls Rulesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up1172arrow-down10
arrow-up1172arrow-down1imageOwls Rulesh.itjust.works@brown567@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 2 years agomessage-square5fedilink
minus-square@M137@lemm.eelinkfedilink8•2 years agoThree of those are correct though… The person that made that somehow failed at “unscienceing”, which is unbelievable.
minus-square@miss_brainfart@lemmy.mllinkfedilink6•edit-22 years agoPretty much all of those are correct, I’d say. but then again, I don’t think the point was to make it incorrect, just to describe it in the least scientific way possible Though sound wave detector is still too sciency for that purpose
Three of those are correct though… The person that made that somehow failed at “unscienceing”, which is unbelievable.
Pretty much all of those are correct, I’d say. but then again, I don’t think the point was to make it incorrect, just to describe it in the least scientific way possible
Though sound wave detector is still too sciency for that purpose