@RothyBuyak@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 2 years agoThis (rule)slemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square142fedilinkarrow-up1635arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1635arrow-down1imageThis (rule)slemmy.blahaj.zone@RothyBuyak@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 2 years agomessage-square142fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarekrimsonbunlinkfedilinkEnglish15•2 years agono they’d each ride a bike because it’s a walkable city
minus-square@LucyLastic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink5•2 years agoWalkable city means taking a bike. Got it.
minus-square@Gabu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•2 years agoLargely, yes. Bicycles are a better, healthier way to move distances longer than 100-ish meters, ideally are only powered by human effort and move at speeds low enough that accidents are absurdly unlikely.
no they’d each ride a bike because it’s a walkable city
Walkable city means taking a bike. Got it.
correct
Largely, yes. Bicycles are a better, healthier way to move distances longer than 100-ish meters, ideally are only powered by human effort and move at speeds low enough that accidents are absurdly unlikely.