Sjmarf to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up1720arrow-down111
arrow-up1709arrow-down1imageSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksSjmarf to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square66fedilink
minus-square@hydrospanner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•2 years agoRelevant username. That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
minus-square@SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink1•2 years agoI googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
minus-square@FilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•2 years ago2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
minus-square@SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink2•2 years ago1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
minus-square@FilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•2 years agoI am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
minus-square@SnipingNinja@slrpnk.netlinkfedilink2•2 years agoThat doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
Relevant username.
That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
Relevant username
2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
That doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet?