The back-to-office backfire: Companies ending WFH perks lose out on top talent, who view flexible work as equivalent to an 8% raise

BrikoX · 2 years ago

The back-to-office backfire: Companies ending WFH perks lose out on top talent, who view flexible work as equivalent to an 8% raise

@Someonelol@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago

A remote worker’s worth is no less valuable than one who’s onsite. If you want something like this to work then the employer should pay a differential for those who have to be onsite to compensate for the time and money spent commuting.

NoIWontPickaName · 2 years ago

So pay the WFF employee more than the WFH employee?

One way is baked in, the other is a topping, still damn near identical though

@Someonelol@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago

Instead of the stick of paying people less from working home, they’re getting a carrot for deciding to be there. That has a wildly more positive perception for workers IMO.