the remaining differences are mostly about aesthetics and not about the use of violence to maintain hegemony

  • @mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    Tbh any doubt I had in his legitimacy is lessened by the U.S abducting him. That demonstrates he’s a legitimate problem for the U.S, which makes it more likely he’s a legitimate boon for the people of his own country (doesn’t confirm it, mind you)

    • Cowbee [he/they]
      link
      fedilink
      03 months ago

      I know it’s not a good line of reasoning, but if you legitimately adopted this mindset you’d be correct 85-99% of the time.

      • @DeepSpace9mm@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        03 months ago

        Could you clarify why it’s not good reasoning?

        • A = u.s. abducts leader
        • B = leader is a problem for the u.s.
        • C = leader is a boon to the people
        • D = leader is (likely) legitimately elected

        Argument:

        • If A then B
        • If B then C
        • If C then D
        • A
        • Therefore D

        We just need “If C then D” to chain A to D since the comment up top didn’t mention it . Oh, I think I see a problem here. In the us with leaders we constantly have “D and not C,” and even worse than the not C’s are the nazis. Ok, I’ll stop.

        • Cowbee [he/they]
          link
          fedilink
          03 months ago

          B doesn’t inherently mean C is correct, there’s just very strong correlation. It’s useful for quickly guessing, not for actual in-depth analysis. Though, the US did really love the Nazis for a good while, still does.

          • @DeepSpace9mm@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            03 months ago

            Yes that makes sense. The premises are too shaky for the argument to be sound despite the valid structure (which the commenter did not use and I pulled out of my ass).

            I was mainly writing it out as an exercise to myself but left it because it kinda worked as a joke lol

            I do very much appreciate an earnest answer.