• Bob Robertson IX
    link
    fedilink
    English
    04 months ago

    This isn’t true, a lot of corporations use and benefit from the foss and they should be supporting those projects.

    They should also be supporting projects that could replace the applications that they spend millions on each year. When your CIO says that they are using ‘whatever corpo system’ because a viable open source project doesn’t exist, they should start funding the non-viable projects so they can become viable.

    • richmondez
      link
      fedilink
      English
      04 months ago

      Worse they often report issues that affect them but still don’t commit resources to resolving those issues.

    • iegod
      link
      fedilink
      English
      04 months ago

      they should be supporting those projects

      As long as the end user is abiding by the licensing terms it shouldn’t be an expectation that any additional support is coming from anywhere. This is the nature of foss. The contributors should know this.

      • Novi Sad
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Licensing terms only govern the legal aspects, not social and moral aspects.

        • iegod
          link
          fedilink
          English
          04 months ago

          Of course, but as we know there is no universal agreements for either. The expectations are ill placed.

          • @tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            04 months ago

            We don’t need the madman who thinks suffering is good to change their mind for sensible people to act, as medicine doesn’t need the madman who thinks alway throwing up is healthy. We place expectations on others everyday: like when we walk past a stranger. Perfect agreement are not needed to have expectations, or demand better from those who benefit from others.