@bartolomeo@suppo.fi to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoAll lives rulesuppo.fiimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageAll lives rulesuppo.fi@bartolomeo@suppo.fi to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-square@PunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•1 year agoLiterally nothing is “good of its own merit”. Because literally nothing is intrinsically “good”. “Good” is a subjective idea, not objectively measurable, so it will always be in reference to another, i.e. relative.
minus-square@WallEx@feddit.delinkfedilink0•1 year agoMaybe for you that’s the case, I definitely have a definition of morally good and both sides aren’t that. Accepting collateral for example. You can’t be good in my book if you’re doing that, and they both did.
minus-square@brain_in_a_box@lemmy.mllinkfedilink0•1 year ago “Good” is a subjective idea one is definitely good compared to the other. K
minus-square@PunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•1 year agoBoth are consistent within the confines of the definition.
Literally nothing is “good of its own merit”. Because literally nothing is intrinsically “good”.
“Good” is a subjective idea, not objectively measurable, so it will always be in reference to another, i.e. relative.
Maybe for you that’s the case, I definitely have a definition of morally good and both sides aren’t that. Accepting collateral for example. You can’t be good in my book if you’re doing that, and they both did.
K
Both are consistent within the confines of the definition.