• masterofn001
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If we are more complex than anything ever, and vastly so, haven’t we disproven the theory / broken the curse?

      What is the baseline / threshold / limit for complexity before a society collapses?

      Is it just human nature to destroy itself?

      • @naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        09 months ago

        You should probably know that historically societies collapsing has typically resulted in improved health of the lower classes as judged by skeletons in the archeological record.

        We should not really understand societies collapsing as a violent or spectacular thing. It’s usually just growth slowing, people move away, the ability of states to enforce taxes and provide services weakens and people work out their own stuff.

        I’m not saying society is collapsing, just that if it does it’ll probably look more like declining birthrates and movement away from cities and advanced manufacturing to more agrarian lifestyle. Also that for the poor and downtrodden this will probably, on average, be an improvement.

    • I Cast Fist
      link
      fedilink
      09 months ago

      Do you suppose the collapse will be next week, right when he arrives?

    • @pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      09 months ago

      meaningless. what does it mean for a society to be complex? what does “collapse” entail? if a certain amount complexity makes a society collapse, why are we more complex than ever? shouldn’t society have collapsed before this point?

      just a bunch of nonsensical words strung together to mean nothing more than “i don’t understand some things and it makes me afraid”. literally the mindset of people who think trans people existing will lead to the downfall of society.

      • @Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        09 months ago

        On top of that assuming societies get more complex over time, of course a collapse would always happen when they are the most complex.

  • I Cast Fist
    link
    fedilink
    09 months ago

    Party pooper here - https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/4923/was-this-quote-on-a-clay-tablet-about-unruly-kids-written-by-an-assyrian

    Quoting the answer from there:

    In summary:

    • I have not shown whether or not this is a quote from an ancient work.
    • I’ve shown that the quote, and its provenance has survived largely intact since the 1920s at least.
    • In particular, it has been traced far further back than Sir Isaac Asimov’s book (as suggested by others here).
    • However, I have shown it was not both Assyrian and from 2800 BC. It may have in Akkadian, a related language, from 2800 BC, but that is earlier than any references I found so I find it unlikely. It might have been Sumerian.
    • IMHO, given the dubious provenance of the source, a more likely scenario is that it is either a true quote, oddly translated, from a much later date, or invented in the early 20th Century.
  • JokeDeity
    link
    fedilink
    09 months ago

    Proof? What is “book” a modern translation for, also?

  • @Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    09 months ago

    The difference is that we went from “the world as we know it” to “the entire world.” The planet is finite.

  • Sparky
    link
    fedilink
    09 months ago

    It’s a tale as old as time, just like the “noone wants to work anymore” tale.

  • @Barzaria@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    09 months ago

    Or bodies are in a constant state of getting older and undergoing collapse. I think that believing in the good old days is a reaction to getting old. I think that believing in some golden past is it reaction to our own bodily degeneration. Fear of our mortality is a powerful force, and I think that a large amount of people externalize/project that fear onto their perception of society.

    • Bob
      link
      fedilink
      09 months ago

      I think it’s more that you get taught the “right” way of doing, speaking, etc. and people are geared to dislike challenges to that idea until they learn to accept change. Another example would be people who’ve learnt how to do a particular task at work being shown a better way of doing it but having a niggling sense that the way they’d learnt first is ipso facto better.

    • hand
      link
      fedilink
      09 months ago

      Saving this comment. It’s a fantastic observation you’ve made, you convinced me.

    • @whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The end of the world hasn’t happened for everyone yet, but the world does end for some individuals every day.

      Reminds me of the poem the florist has in Grim Fandango that goes something like: it may be years, it may be hours, but sooner or later everyone pushes up flowers.

    • @general_kitten@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      09 months ago

      The bronze age collapse happened ~1600 years after that tablet was written, i guess that could count as an end of the world(that they knew)

  • @Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I understand the point. But it misses an extremely important factor: technology.

    Yes, humans have played pretend we were this world’s owners/masters since civilization began.

    But our toolbox is filled with tech that can literally reverse terraform the climate against us, and we’re using it with abandon and without restraint. Add to that AI, CRISPR derived bioweapons, etc. We’ve gotten to the point where we cobble together yet another means of world wide destruction every decade or two, and we all know we’re too stupid and selfish not to for the prospect short term, individual gain.

    They were monkeys with spears and swords, a threat to rival monkey tribes, but in no way the entire species. We are monkeys with nukes.

    “It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity”

    -Albert Einstein