• @jinarched@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    010 months ago

    I condemn such political violence, but I wouldn’t have shed a single tear for Trump.

    Fuck MAGA. Fuck Trump.

    • Cowbee [he/they]
      link
      fedilink
      010 months ago

      Why condemn it? Violence is an unfortunate tool, but a tool nontheless, and abandoning it when oppressors use it without care just means you aren’t taking things seriously. Hitler should have been assassinated.

      • _NoName_
        link
        fedilink
        010 months ago

        By weighing all violence as immoral you are not ruling it out completely. You make it a last-resort, where you avoid one great injustice with a lesser injustice - a lesser injustice which you still face consequences for.

        The alternative is morally sanctifying some murders, which leads to ‘morally justified’ murders being done by all political sides (since they each view themselves as ‘the moral ones’), and which eventually gets twisted into the party in power murdering their opponents with impunity because it’s ‘morally justified’.

        • Cowbee [he/they]
          link
          fedilink
          010 months ago

          Moralism itself is just a tool to justify the status quo. Nothing is inherently good by maintaining “civility,” especially if violence is the status quo.

          Shooting Nazis is good. Shooting Gazans is bad. Violence is a tool, but not always the correct one, nor is it never correct.

          • _NoName_
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I think that is a misreading of why moral codes come into being, and I am not trying to preach moralism.

            Moral codes are not universal truths, but instead rules of engagement for maintaining order within a system, and they exist within every social social scope, though their level of detail tends to decay as the scope becomes more interpersonal. They’re not really a tool of the state, but instead just a human tool. The state just codifies its own and disseminates it into the social collectives it rules.

            My statement above is a moral observation about political morality within the US, and which I view is generally a useful rule within any democratic political system (I am referring to systems which have a structure and voting system associated with democratic processes, not necessarily ideal or actual democracies).

            I am also not saying that this moral code is necessarily good for us or the system itself at any given moment, but stating why this moral code exists in the first place, and why anyone who is apart of our system and wants that system to survive (whether that be for avoiding personal turmoil or political ideology) will continue to condemn assassination attempts from any side.

            • Cowbee [he/they]
              link
              fedilink
              010 months ago

              Moral codes are not universal truths, but instead rules of engagement for maintaining order within a system, and they exist within every social scope, though their level of detail tends to decay as the scope becomes more interpersonal. They’re not really a tool of the state, but instead just a human tool. The state just codifies its own and disseminates it into the social collectives it rules.

              Yes, moral codes are generally arbitrary. When wielded by the state to maintain the status quo, it becomes a tool of the state.

              My statement above is a moral observation about political morality within the US, and which I view is generally a useful rule within any democratic political system (I am referring to systems which have a structure and voting system associated with democratic processes, not necessarily ideal or actual democracies).

              The US isn’t truly democratic. Both major parties serve the interests of their donors, ie huge Capitalists, and the candidates presented fit with that alignment. In this manner, political pressure outside the scope of “civility” is presented as immoral, despite civility itself being used to perpetuate anti-democratic structures.

              I am also not saying that this moral code is necessarily good for us or the system itself at any given moment, but stating why this moral code exists in the first place, and why anyone who is apart of our system and wants that system to survive (whether that be for avoiding personal turmoil or political ideology) will continue to condemn assassination attempts from any side.

              Yes, this is why Biden has batted more for Trump than any child murdered in Gaza. Biden needs civility to remain, or else he too will become a target.

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    fedilink
    010 months ago

    I would like to put it on the record that I’m 100% not MAGA. Not today. Not ever. Also, go fuck yourself.

  • @supertrucker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    I’m not MAGA, but anyone that supports assasination as a tool of politics is a traitor to the constitution and a terrorist against the people and should be dealt with accordingly

    • @BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Killing a traitor isn’t traitorous.

      And even if it was, fuck the US. I’d gladly betray the nation for the sake of its people.

    • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Dealt with accordingly? You mean like assassinated? Just for their political beliefs about assassination? Sounds pretty terroristic, man

      • @supertrucker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        It wouldn’t have mattered if you kill Hitler. Someone else would have risen up and taken power, eventually kicking off WW2. The conditions in early 1930s Germany were too ripe not to have a demagogue take total power there. If you wanted to prevent those events from happening, you prevent the great depression, not kill some leader of a nation

        • Cowbee [he/they]
          link
          fedilink
          010 months ago

          True, someone else would have taken his place, but not immediately. If you can’t prevent the depression, you have to struggle on the ground.

    • GulbuddinHekmatyarOP
      link
      fedilink
      010 months ago

      Wdym… civility demands this, so?

      😭 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

    • GulbuddinHekmatyarOP
      link
      fedilink
      010 months ago

      I understand…

      😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭

  • @TehBamski@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    010 months ago

    You don’t have to be a MAGA worshiper to be a decent human being that doesn’t want someone to be killed by a random person, because of their beliefs or talking points. That being said… I want to hear that Trump died in a federal prison of natural causes.

    • GulbuddinHekmatyarOP
      link
      fedilink
      010 months ago

      Wdym… don’t ye see the bad in assassinating (ex-)president Trump…

      Bruz, I cannogt believe the incivility of this radical leftist to say this shit, man! I thought this was like Reddit…

      😭 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

    • @ulkesh@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Neither am I. MAGA asshats can go screw off. They want to destroy this country. I don’t condone assassination unless truly warranted (talking overt, doubtless genocide as an example), I sure as hell don’t commiserate with MAGA just because of this incident.

  • @ninjabard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    010 months ago

    I’m not condoning what was done. It truly is awful what happened. However, you spout hateful, phobic, misogynistic, ableist rhetoric since the 2016 campaign? Maybe don’t be surprised.