• @Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    Many issues with this headline, but one of them is the word journalist, which implies some form of neutrality. The headline should either be a L out a journalist that writes about antifa, or a pro-facism activist. I suspect from the context (Fox) that it’s the latter.

    • MacN'Cheezus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      journalist, which implies some form of neutrality

      Oh, my sweet summer child

            • @JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              Everybody has some sort of bias towards something. It’s ultimately just an opinion.

              Journalistic integrity isn’t about being non-biased, it’s about being upfront about bias and ideally the journalist actively trying to counter their own bias within their work.

        • MacN'Cheezus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          The vast majority of journalists work for some sort of publication or news agency, in which they’re beholden to the company owners’ agenda and have to report to an editorial board, which decides what can and can not be published in accordance with their views.

          You’re thinking of independent journalists, of which there are very few.

          • @TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            Ok, the fact that you honestly believe this is how legitimate newsrooms work is both deeply disheartening and an indication of how little the average person knows about the news business.

            Editors decide what gets published, not the editorial board which is an entirely different and unrelated body that traditionally has zero contact with the content side of things. In the business we say that there is a “firewall” between the editorial board and actual news content. The NYT or WaPo would have mass resignations of their reporters if either of their editorial boards tried to influence content.

            Ownership is a bit different and obviously --as we know from the Murdoch empire-- can influence content, but in traditional operations they’ve always been very hands-off. It’s a fact, for example, that Jeff Bezos doesn’t care what the WaPo publishes and has no interest in it beyond as a business concern.

            Editors do have control over content, but overwhelmingly they are concerned with doing a good job and furthering their careers and professional reputations. You’re completely misunderstanding the incentive structure in mainstream news media. Outside of the extremist advocacy journalism ecosystems --mostly but not only on the far right-- no one has any incentive to push an agenda and risk ruining their career by getting something important wrong.

            • MacN'Cheezus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              Ah yes, it’s only the evil right wing news outlets that have issues with transparency and corruption, but don’t worry, all the left wing ones are totally honest.

              And all billionaires are evil exploiters… unless they own liberal newspapers, then they’re totally ethical and there is no grounds for concern.

    • @Lianodel@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      I believe that’s Andy Ngo, so yes, absolutely a pro-fascist activist. He was caught on camera actively coordinating with Patriot Prayer, a far-right extremist group.

    • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It kinda does since, despite GOP talking points to the contrary, Antifa is not a terrorist group or even a group at all. It’s a movement with the sole purpose of opposition to fascism.

      At best, being anti-antifa is being pro-fascist and the difference between that and being a fascist is miniscule if existent.

  • PatFusty
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    What’s a fascist mean to you nerds anyways? Like what does it even mean to be anti fascist?

    • Quoting Georgi Dimitrov:

      “Fascism is not a form of state power “standing above both classes – the proletariat and the bourgeoisie,” as Otto Bauer, for instance, has asserted. It is not “the revolt of the petty bourgeoisie which has captured the machinery of the state,” as the British Socialist Brailsford declares. No, fascism is not a power standing above class, nor government of the petty bourgeoisie or the lumpen-proletariat over finance capital. Fascism is the power of finance capital itself. It is the organization of terrorist vengeance against the working class and the revolutionary section of the peasantry and intelligentsia. In foreign policy, fascism is jingoism in its most brutal form, fomenting bestial hatred of other nations… The development of fascism, and the fascist dictatorship itself, assume different forms in different countries, according to historical, social and economic conditions and to the national peculiarities, and the international position of the given country.”

    • @pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      It was so frustrating watching some people treat him like he was anything close to a real journalist. He’s just the designated propagandist.

  • Tb0n3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    Anti-antifa only means you’re against the people claiming to be anti-fascist. It doesn’t mean you like fascism. Nor does being antifa mean everything you’re against is fascism.

    • @pifox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      I think it should be noted, the difference between antifa the organization and antifa the philosophy.

      I am very much ideologically anti-fascist and I believe I would take up arms against a fascist government, however antifa the org has made some questionable calls in the past.

      • @odium@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        There is no overarching antifa organization though. Try looking for a website/forum/etc of antifa. There are websites for random local activist groups which call themselves <city name> antifa, but there is no leader or comittee overseeing these groups. There is no process to join antifa, any activist group or individual can call themselves antifa.

        So there are no calls made by antifa, good or bad. There are only calls made by individuals or local groups that call themselves antifa.

        • @pifox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Fair. I think you can understand them as a group still, similarly to how you can see anonymous as a group.

          I don’t think I’m educated enough to say anything against the group as a whole, as I haven’t sat down to do a lot of research on them (I’m realizing now that my comment was made from a BS bias that I had picked up from when I was a conservative).

          however I don’t think the logic of the source meme on it’s own shows someone as fascist just because they oppose the antifa orginization.

          • Arthur BesseM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            I don’t think I’m educated enough to say anything against the group as a whole, as I haven’t sat down to do a lot of research on them (I’m realizing now that my comment was made from a BS bias that I had picked up from when I was a conservative).

            You should do more research :)

            Unless you’re talking about this one, referring to “the antifa organization” makes as little sense as saying “the conservative organization”. There are many organizations with variously overlapping goals and strategies for achieving them, but there hasn’t been a singular “antifa organization” since 1933.

          • @odium@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            I do agree that someone isn’t a fascist if they disagree with antifa. I was just talking about the part where you talked about antifa the organization.

          • @can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            (I’m realizing now that my comment was made from a BS bias that I had picked up from when I was a conservative).

            Damn that’s refreshing to read.

      • YeetPics
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Where is “antifa the organization” headquartered?

      • KptnAutismus
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        i hate fascists with a passion, but i might not agree with how antifa acts. i do not have any experience with the group itself, i might even agree with them.

        for example, i do not like how the last generation glued themselves to streets. that doesn’t make me a climate denier, does it?

          • @S410@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            How does burning a car improve anything? By what logic does not burning a car equal to “fucking over the next 15 generations”?
            Misdirected rage, even if it’s initially for a good reason, doesn’t help anything. If there’s a house on fire, you pour water on that house, not one two streets over. You do the latter, you end up with two destroyed houses: one burned, the other flooded.

          • KptnAutismus
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            i am against throwing rocks at police and lighting cars on fire in the name of antifascism. you don’t get taken seriously if you’re the one comitting arson.

        • @CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          There is no singular group called “antifa”. It’s a movement of loosely (at best) interconnected but independent, antifascist groups.
          Also, we need all these groups. It’s them who usually organize rallies against racism, fascism, antisemitism, inhuman law proposals, et cetera. Also they organize all sorts of other actions against alt right, far right and (neo-)nazis, like disrupting their rallies and standing in the way of goon squads.
          Antifa groups are damn important.

        • @vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          I’m baffled as to what the point of this comment is, besides waffling about the virtues of not picking sides for not picking sides’ sake.

          • KptnAutismus
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            i have picked the side that’s stopping fascists. but the enemy of my enemy isn’t automatically my friend. i do not respect movents who are known for committing arson and battery regularly.

            • @CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I see your edit above, i see the comments you posted after said edit, and I’m not sure you now actually got what antifa means. Especially the part about it not being a single, coherent organization doesn’t seem to get to you.

              • KptnAutismus
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                it did. but these smaller, unorganized groups are regularly holding violent protests around my area. and they identify with antifa.

                i probably identify with the core values of what it means to be antifascist, but again, i don’t want to be seen as extremist and/or violent.

        • YeetPics
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Might not agree with how antifa acts

          I have no experience

          ^^^ this pattern shows up right before you make a poorly thought out comment. If you don’t have experience with something I’d expect your comment to be a question for someone who has.

        • @crispy_kilt@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          but violent protests don’t contribute

          There is no alternative to fighting fascists with violence. You can’t have a nice talk with someone who is gunning down Jewish persons. You just shoot them in the face.

          Someone supports fascists who want to genocide a group of people? Burning down their car is less than they deserve.

          I invite you to learn more about the holocaust. The suffering cannot be put into words. There is no means too drastic to prevent something like it to ever happen again.

          • KptnAutismus
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            let me rephrase. violence not directed at fascists doesn’t contribute.

            i was referring to innocent people’s property being destroyed.

            if someone arsons a nazi, that’s perfectly reasonable to me.

        • Its not “the group”.If you look in left and right wing violence in most countries you’ll see a huge disparity, even after the right wing police has significantly biased the statistics. Most people in Antifa groups just go to demos, organize workshops and put political stickers up.

          Thats alle the stuff Fox wants to villify, because they want people to be fascists.

      • @InputZero@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Stop it! Do you want another very long word? Cause that’s how you get very long words. How do you think got the word, antidisestablishmentteroistism?! I already had to learn that word, I don’t want to learn a longer one.

  • @Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    I seem to recall seeing a video or reading an article where they mention that the media turned antifa into a sort of separate word to warp its meaning. Instead of saying anti fascist, which has a clear meaning, they shortened it and changed the pronunciation ‘an teefa’ (something to do with which syllable you emphasise) so they could distort its meani g and demonise the word to make people think it was bad.

    So now people dont realise antifa means anti fascist which is surely a good thing to be, and instead, they fear antifa as some kind of terrorist group, which is almost the opposite of what it is.

    The funny thing is, as an outsider to this, living in the UK, our media doesn’t ever use the term, and when i heard it, my instinct was to look up its meaning. It’s interesting to me that i won’t know if i would have fallen for it if the media were using it in the same way over here to lead my understanding of its definition

    • @LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      I think Antifa actually started in the UK even before the Nazi’s. Eh actually not but they did fight against fascists in the UK as early as 1930.

      The reason why we need antifa and why it’s hated by the mainstream is because the establishment is notoriously bad at stopping fascism. There is a long history of it. So besides liberal antifa that uses legal means like suing the KKK out of existence, the autonomous antifa is actually needed for the continued working of our democracy.

      • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Afaik, the first Antifa were a coalition of left wing groups in Italy fighting fascists in the 1920s. They didn’t necessarily use the term but they were the first active anti-fascists so that counts in my book 🤷

        As a side note, they were left to fight both the fascists and the royalists alone, since the Italian Liberals refused to get involved until it was clear who would win and then joined the fascists.

        • @LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          I think that is the lesson, liberals do not effectively fight against fascism because they are too desiring of orderly and calm and polite politics and too much powered by economic interests (bourgeois). So we actually rely on antifa as a social force. Neither the state nor the liberals will fight against it. At least that is my limited understanding of it, since this is never discussed about in mainstream media.

          • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            liberals do not effectively fight against fascism because they are too desiring of orderly and calm and polite politics and too much powered by economic interests

            Absolutely 100% correct.

            So we actually rely on antifa as a social force.

            We need to, yes.

            Neither the state nor the liberals will fight against it.

            Right you are again!

            At least that is my limited understanding of it, since this is never discussed about in mainstream media.

            Seems to me you understand it perfectly but yeah, the mainstream media is for-profit and owned by billionaires who are often friends with or at least have common interests with the fascists, so they have very logical, if despicable, reasons to be hands-off about it.

      • @PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Antifa (Antifaschistische Aktion) under that name started in 1932 as action by the KPD to organise widest possible front against the nazis, in the face of SPD as a party being very reluctant to act against nazis. Many SPD members did joined, but as we know, their own party in reichstag made that futile.

        Of course antifascist resistance is about as old as fascism or even older considering protofascists activity even before Mussolini coined the term, but the name itself is from 1932 KPD.

    • @TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Yeah that’s bullshit. There isn’t some secret cabal that’s in charge of US journalism anymore than there is in the UK. What really happens is that because the old news-media business models have been utterly destroyed by the Internet, there’s a giant and never-ending competition for audience and everyone knows that sensationalism sells.

      You have a similar problem in the UK but it’s not as pronounced because the BBC is government funded and even though it’s far from perfect, it does set a kind of baseline. Your other big news organizations are just as bad as in the US though. Your tabloids are actually a lot worse than ours, which is saying something.

    • @Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      They have a constant and desperate effort to invent words they can’t define that categorize their blind rage since they’re not allowed to say one that starts with N. “Woke” is the newest one.